United States v. $1,106,775 in US Currency

The court ordered the case reheard en banc upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges under Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 40(c) and Circuit Rule 40-3, vacating the three-judge panel opinion.

Docket

Court

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Court level

appellate

Jurisdiction

Federal

Date filed

October 28, 2025

Parties

$1,106,775.00 IN UNITED STATES CURRENCY · appellantUNITED STATES OF AMERICA · appelleeOAK PORCELLI · appellant

Judges

Murguia · majority, author

Status

published

Disposition

The case is reheard en banc, and the three-judge panel opinion is vacated.

Opinion type

combined

Format

order

Nature of suit

Drug Related Seizure of Property

Date argued

January 14, 2026

Source

View PDF

FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. $1,106,775.00 IN UNITED STATES CURRENCY, Defendant-Appellant, and OAK PORCELLI, Claimant-Appellant.

No. 22-16499 D.C. No. 3:20-cv-00158-MMD-CSD District of Nevada, Reno

ORDER

MURGUIA , Chief Judge:

Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it is ordered that this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 40(c) and Circuit Rule 40-3. The three-judge panel opinion is vacated.